Message recu ce matin d'un (a priori) Captain américain :
So did you pay for your job in the end?
You say American training is more practical, but I for one am glad no one here is in a 737 with so few hours.
Your blog and pictures make it seem the most fun you have is showing other people what you're doing. You actually disrespect the job and the love of flying in doing so.
When I had under a thousand hours I certainly wasnt worried about taking pictures.
What airline do you work for? Oh Im sure they dont want you to say and posting pics from their flightdeck when you should be working on becoming a better pilot first.
Sorry to be harsh but thats how it appears to a 15,0000 hour airline pilot in the US.
Pour ceux qui ont un peu
de mal avec l'anglais, en clair ca dit qu'avant d'avoir beaucoup (plusieurs milliers) d'heures
de vol, on devrait se la fermer, ne pas prendre
de photo et ne pas écrire
de blog.
Il trouve ca disrespectueux envers le métier et la passion pour l'aviation.
Ma réponse :
Dear David,
Oddly enough, I agree with some of the points you mention here.
I do not have 3000-4000 hours as a pilot would need to fly a 737 in the US.
How much is "so few hours" for you, I am really curious.
As far as I am aware, there is no mention on my blog of how many hours I have logged since I started flying 10 years ago.
Who said I had less than a thousand hours? Now you're making me very curious.
I have enough to apply to most airlines operating regional jets in the US (if I was eligible to work over there).
I have an Aerospace engineer background, hundreds of hours in gliders, aerobatic ratings, flew quite a few tail wheel planes, several hundreds of hours in towplanes, another several hundred of hours in Kingairs.
Ah well, this does not seem like a lot when you have 15,000 hours in your logbook. Were you born with 15,000 hours or you started like most people with no flight experience?
I do share what I do. Well, this is why it is called a "blog".
When I was younger, those line stories were greatly motivating. They still are now by the way.
Why wouldn't I share mine?
You typically remind me of the Captains in Asia keeping a very steep cockpit gradient but I thought this would be different in the US.
In Europe, most airlines now try to lower the cockpit gradient and push the FOs into advocating their opinions. You probably think that's wrong but my company, like a few others in Europe, have never had a single crash nor a single fatality in decades of existence.
I initially opened this blog to share what the pilot training is all about and to motivate aspiring pilots to train the "modular way" rather than "integrated", in Europe. This is some two and a half times cheaper, and the life experience is worth it.
Then I gained employment after applying to thousands of airlines worldwide. So I decided to keep writing a few entries.
My company provides good working conditions and decent salary, I loved the experience I have had on the Kingair and towplanes but I was really struggling financially. I seized the opportunity to fly the 737. Who wouldn't have?
As for taking pictures, I take most of them while seating on the jumpseat and obversing other, more experienced, pilots do their job. I learn from watching them.
I should also mention taking pictures was/still is a way of making money, and this is a hobby in the first place.
In cruise, I talk with the Captain, ask questions and learn from his own experience. I never read newspapers or magazines. When I can, I read the FCOM's, QRH and Operating manuals. In a 5 hour cruise, there still is enough time to take a few pictures.
As for the first question, I did pay for my pilot training. Is it free now in the US? Last time I checked, it wasn't, and it was actually twice more expensive than what I paid (through a bank loan and various ground-based jobs).
I agree with two points of yours, Sir.
I do not have 4000 hours, and blogging as a 737 newly-recruited FO can be seen as arrogant.
Fair enough.
I may live on a fairy world, I give you that one too.
But instead of spreading gloom and doom like a lot of people on this planet do, I share pictures and videos for Aviation enthusiasts, I share the experience of the "dream job" a lot of people have, I answer and help almost anyone who contacts me, and I probably help a few other keep a bit of Faith.
En quelques mots, je lui donne raison sur deux choses : j'ai peu d'heures comparé a ce qu'ont la plupart des pilotes débutants sur 737 aux US (il faut en général 4000h
de vol aux US pour espérer voir la couleur d'un cockpit
de 320 ou 737, quand en Europe c'est possible avec 250h. Aux US, on fait généralement
de l'instruction jusqu'a 700-800h, pour ensuite passer sur Kingair/Cheyenne ou avion du meme type, puis une fois la barre des 1500h passée, on débute dans les "régionales" sur CRJ, ERJ, et jets régionaux. Enfin, vers 4000h
de vol, on peut postuler pour les majors et voler sur les "medium jets").
Des compagnies comme Ryanair et easyJet qui recrutent essentiellement des jeunes avec peu d'heures, n'ont connu, durant toute leur existence, aucun crash et aucun mort. Ryanair, c'est 1,5 fois la taille d'Air France en terme
de passagers transportés, et 25 ans d'existance. easyJet n'est pas loin derriere et transporte aussi plus
de passagers qu'Air France, British Airways, Iberia, etc ... sans avoir jamais connu le moindre crash fatal.
Je ne défends pas forcément le fait
de se retrouver dans un gros avion avec peu d'expérience, je trouve moi aussi plus logique
de passer par les turboprops avant, mais jusqu'a preuve
de contraire, mettre des jeunes avec peu d'heures dans un cockpit
de 320 n'est pas une entrave a la sécurité pour autant.
Le deuxieme point sur lequel je lui donne raison, c'est que le fait d'avoir un blog + poster des photos + poster des vidéos en
ligne, ca a une certaine part d'arrogance. C'est certain et j'en suis conscient. Le fait
de partager sa passion, ou dit autrement, une partie
de sa vie, c'est arrogant.
Est-il possible d'écrire un blog sans donner ce coté arrogant? A moins
de parler
de la pluie et du beau temps, je ne pense pas.
Je lui réponds donc que je préfere le coté arrogant du jeune
pilote peu expérimenté, qui fait rever bon nombre
de jeunes et en poussent un paquet a croire en leur reve, plutot que le coté "démotivant" et triste du vieux Captain blasé qui préfere décourager les jeunes en ne gardant a l'esprit que les inconvénients.
C'est un beau métier, accessible, et je préfere voir dans les cockpits
de jeunes gens motivés et passionnés depuis leur plus tendre enfance que d'autres qui n'ont qu'un tres faible interet pour l'aviation. Ces derniers ne trainent généralement pas sur les blogs d'avions ou les sites
de photos aéros.
J'aimerais bien avoir votre avis sur la question.
Ca va peut-etre au-dela
de ce que j'imagine et ce Captain a peut etre raison.
Est-ce "too much"
de poster des photos, vidéos et posts sur un blog (+ le forum)?
J'ai eu une majorité
de feedbacks positifs mais je ne vois pas d'inconvénient a changer les choses si c'est mal percu ou si ca donne une mauvaise image du métier.